Comparing virtual roads: Rouvy vs Zwift

The drudgery of indoor training has been significantly lightened with the emergence of virtual training platforms like Rouvy and Zwift. These platforms transport cyclists from the confinements of their homes onto scenic virtual roads, making each training session an exploration. While both are leading contenders in the realm of virtual cycling, their offerings have distinct flavours.

Immersing in Virtual Realism on Rouvy and Zwift

Rouvy stands out with its emphasis on real-world routes. It offers a vast array of real routes with high-definition videos that create a realistic riding experience. On the other hand, Zwift leans towards a gamified approach, creating a massively multiplayer online world where cyclists can ride in a variety of imaginative environments. The distinct core philosophy shapes the user experience on each platform, making the choice between them a matter of personal preference.


Engagement Through Competition

Competition is a driving force that propels cyclists to push beyond their limits. Zwift has a strong community aspect with a plethora of races and group rides. The platform’s race functionality is robust, offering a range of events that cater to different fitness levels. The virtual peloton in Zwift is a bustling space where cyclists can test their mettle against others in real-time.

On the flip side, Rouvy adopts a more solitary approach but compensates with its Challenge feature. Cyclists can take on various challenges, whether climbing the steep grades of iconic ascents or covering a certain distance within a specified period. The platform also hosts official races, but they are not as frequent or as varied as those on Zwift. The competitive spirit is present on both platforms but manifests in different forms.

Structured Training

Structured training is the bedrock of progression for any cyclist. Zwift and Rouvy provide a suite of training plans and workouts designed by certified coaches. Zwift’s workout mode is well-structured with a clean interface, making it easy for users to follow the training plan. The platform also allows for custom workout creation, providing flexibility for those with specific training goals.

Rouvy, too, offers a broad spectrum of workouts and allows custom workout creation. However, its unique selling point is the augmented reality (AR) feature in workouts. Cyclists can ride real-world routes with a blend of virtual competitors and objects, making the training session both engaging and effective. The AR feature bridges the gap between structured training and an immersive riding experience.


Data Analysis: Rouvy vs Zwift

Data is the compass that guides training decisions. Both Zwift and Rouvy provide robust data analysis tools. Zwift has a partnership with Today’s Plan and TrainingPeaks, allowing for seamless data sync and analysis. It also provides in-game metrics that help riders gauge their performance during rides.

Rouvy, on the other hand, has an in-built analytics platform that provides a comprehensive breakdown of the ride data. It meticulously tracks and analyses a rider’s performance over time, offering insights that can inform training decisions. The analytical depth of Rouvy is a valuable asset for cyclists keen on monitoring their progression closely.

Cost Implications

Investing in a virtual training platform is a consideration of both monetary cost and the value derived. Zwift comes with a monthly subscription fee of £12.99, providing access to all its features. The vibrant community and the gamified experience often justify the cost for many.

Rouvy has a tiered subscription model starting at £6.99 per month for the basic package, going up to £12.99 for the premium. The premium subscription unlocks the full array of features including AR. The choice between Rouvy and Zwift could well come down to individual budget constraints and the value each rider sees in the features offered by each platform.

Subscribe to receive posts from